netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] qed*: RDMA and infrastructure for iWARP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170618.214041.682320908274865753.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michal.Kalderon@...ium.com,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/7] qed*: RDMA and infrastructure for iWARP

From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:54:49 +0000

> I can't really say I understand who would benefit from adding "while
> at it remove redundant inclusion of header file" to the commit log
> message [And even less from splitting this into its own patch].

Because it helps people understand why you are making a change.

It's not obvious from just reading it.

That's why.