[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMgPWdg8gnAuGgufuxeYt4qDKrs8g+LBgm3BBG9KHnjGsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:13:43 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] nfp: add flower app with representors
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Simon Horman
<simon.horman@...ronome.com> wrote:
> this series adds a flower app to the NFP driver.
> It initialises four types of netdevs:
>
> * PF netdev - lower-device for communication of packets to device
> * PF representor netdev
> * VF representor netdevs
> * Phys port representor netdevs
>
> The PF netdev acts as a lower-device which sends and receives packets to
> and from the firmware. The representors act as upper-devices. For TX
> representors attach a metadata dst to the skb which is used by the PF
> netdev to prepend metadata to the packet before forwarding the firmware. On
> RX the PF netdev looks up the representor based on the prepended metadata
> recieved from the firmware and forwards the skb to the representor after
> removing the metadata.
Hi Simon, Jakub
Good to have more VF representors around...
> Control queues are used to send and receive control messages which are
> used to communicate configuration information with the firmware. These
> are in separate vNIC to the queues belonging to the PF netdev. The control
> queues are not exposed to use-space via a netdev or any other means.
Do you have documentation for the control channel or I should look on
earlier commits?
The control messages you describe here are also the ones that are used
to load/unload
specific app?
> As the name implies this app is targeted at providing offload of TC flower.
> That will be added by follow-up work. This patchset focuses on adding phys
> port and VF representor netdevs to which flower classifiers may be attached.
I guess you want to have switch ID so if someone looks on the reps (ip -d)
they can realize they all belong to the same e-switch, we are using
switchdev attribute for that matter.
Few nits from building from static checker below.
Or.
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c:78:1: warning:
symbol 'nfp_repr_phy_port_get_stats64' was not declared. Should it be
static?
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c:98:1: warning:
symbol 'nfp_repr_vf_get_stats64' was not declared. Should it be
static?
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c:118:1: warning:
symbol 'nfp_repr_pf_get_stats64' was not declared. Should it be
static?
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c:262:40: warning:
incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c:262:40: expected
unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] port_id
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c:262:40: got
restricted __be32 [usertype] <noident>
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c:116:19: warning: cast
to restricted __be32
Powered by blists - more mailing lists