[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621161149.GB10200@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:11:49 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Chien Tin Tung <chien.tin.tung@...el.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Ariel Almog <ariela@...lanox.com>,
Linux Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 13/19] RDMA/netlink: Add netlink device
definitions to UAPI
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:05:22AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> RDMA_NL_IWCM,
> RDMA_NL_RSVD,
> RDMA_NL_LS, /* RDMA Local Services */
> + /*
> + * RDMA_NL_I40IW not in use and it was added here by mistake,
> + * but we need to keep it anyway, because it is UAPI and for
> + * unknown reasons, someone in the field decided to replace "5"
> + * with this define.
> + */
> RDMA_NL_I40IW,
Since this doesn't do anything, never did anything, I think you should
just delete it. Anything in userspace that refers to this name is
unconditionally broken and a compile failure is the better choice.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists