netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <594ACEB7.2030707@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 21:53:27 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
CC:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

On 06/21/2017 09:37 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Good news. Got the CALL to work.
>
> [  145.670882] test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed]
>
> Awesome. Do you think with this implementation, the patch could get
> accepted? If you think so, then I will send the patch in couple of
> days after some refactoring, if not, then do let me know what more is
> required?

Nice, it's ultimately up to the arm folks to review the set in-depth,
but feel free to send out the patch once you're done refactoring. With
BPF_CALL support that looks quite good from pov of supported insns.