netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHgaXdKm6atQ=XkrQf+ShKtPU7=H+pS2VvPsTXXhz2yzOFunmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jun 2017 01:07:16 +0530
From:   Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler

Hi Daniel,

Good news. Got the CALL to work.

[  145.670882] test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed]

Awesome. Do you think with this implementation, the patch could get
accepted? If you think so, then I will send the patch in couple of
days after some refactoring, if not, then do let me know what more is
required?

Best,
Shubham Bansal


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 04:26 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> So ultimately, we call helper_function which takes u64 as arguments
>> only. I know its asking a lot, but can you please confirm this asap? I
>> would like to start implementing it.
>
>
> Yes, that is correct. I think it would be the better, more generic
> approach going forward to always assume that.