netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: add check on e1e

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABawtvMeV9=_hhECX1hkVE5+fOytBdaf2pYtSU9xAfY_yPK-Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:44:16 +0800
From:   Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: add check on e1e_wphy() return value

Gustavo,

   The return value of ret_val seems used to check if the access to PHY/NVM
got its semaphore,  generally speaking, it is needed for every PHY
access of this driver.

Reviewed-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
<garsilva@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> Check return value from call to e1e_wphy(). This value is being
> checked during previous calls to function e1e_wphy() and it seems
> a check was missing here.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1226905
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> index 68ea8b4..d6d4ed7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> @@ -2437,6 +2437,8 @@ static s32 e1000_hv_phy_workarounds_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>                 if (hw->phy.revision < 2) {
>                         e1000e_phy_sw_reset(hw);
>                         ret_val = e1e_wphy(hw, MII_BMCR, 0x3140);
> +                       if (ret_val)
> +                               return ret_val;
>                 }
>         }
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>