[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+M3ks58dO0m+XdQ=3rZvr+Vfj7RcrBON-KC4a-ThNhq+e7V_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:14:34 +0200
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
2017-06-21 0:08 GMT+02:00 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:
> Hi!
>
>> >> > This is it.
>> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6219401/
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that
>> >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs,
>> >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense.
>>
>> What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations
>> coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has
>> deprecated.
>>
>> I agree that will change nothing of hardware limitation but at least
>> the limit will
>> not come from the framework.
>
>> > Yes, we agree on that but I won't cherry pick working patches from a 51
>> > patches series.
>
> Well, it would be actually nice for you to do the cherry
> picking. That's something maintainers do, because it is hard for
> contributors to guess maintainer's taste.
>
> Anyway, it looks like someone should go through all the RTC drivers,
> and document their limitations of each driver (date in future when
> hardware ceases to be useful). If Benjamin has time to do that, I
> guess that removes all the objections to the series.
Without the datasheet I can check in driver code what they do in read/set
time functions to understand their limitations. All drivers using BCD
like system
or spliting day and time should be fixed. I can do a subset of my patches
including those driver + the acked ones.
Alexandre does that sound reasonable for you ?
> Regards,
> Pavel
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists