[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621091948.GP4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:19:49 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
"patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
"adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:39:07AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 21/06/2017 at 09:51:52 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > If someone uses different threshold, well, there will be
> > confusion. But only for users that have their rtc set to the past,
> > which is quite unusual.
> >
>
> Or not, having an RTC set in the past is actually quite common. I'd find
> it weird to have a new device boot and be set to a date in the future.
... and that basically means you can't use hardware that stores RTC
time as a 32-bit number of seconds past 2106.
> Also note that the threshold or offset thing may seem like a good idea
> but fails with many RTCs because of how they handle leap years.
Not for the case being discussed. A 32-bit counter of seconds knows
nothing about leap years - all that is handled by the conversion
functions.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists