netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/11] net: phy: Add rockchip phy driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8013275.fit4cPZyaE@phil>
Date:   Sat, 24 Jun 2017 18:05:35 +0200
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, olof@...om.net, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        arnd@...db.de, f.fainelli@...il.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
        hwg@...k-chips.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] net: phy: Add rockchip phy driver support

Am Samstag, 24. Juni 2017, 16:04:06 CEST schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > hmm, we do have quite a number of non-net phys in the phy subsystem
> > (DP, PCIe, ...) and given that the above would be CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_PHY
> > in a global sense, sounds like it could make things confusing.
> > 
> > So some addition sounds reasonable ... ROCKCHIP_ETH_PHY or so?
> 
> I follow you reasoning, but generic phy is the new kid on the
> block. It is well established that Ethernet PHYs are called
> <MANUFACTURER>_PHY.

Ok, then without further bikeshedding, let's just go with your
naming then (ROCKCHIP_PHY) :-) .


Heiko

> If you do want to consider generic phy, the logical name would be
> ROCKCHIP_PHY_PHY, since generic phy postfixes with _SATA, _USB, _PCIE,
> etc. But that does leave an issues when we have an Ethernet PHY which
> needs a generic PHY. In some sense, SERDES could be considered as
> something supported by a generic PHY...
> 
> 	Andrew
> 
>