[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C6251E1@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 01:21:59 +0000
From: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: add check on
e1e_wphy() return value
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org] On Behalf
> Of Gustavo A. R. Silva
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:23 PM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: add check on
> e1e_wphy() return value
>
> Check return value from call to e1e_wphy(). This value is being
> checked during previous calls to function e1e_wphy() and it seems
> a check was missing here.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1226905
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists