netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] nfp: add a stats handler for flower offloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMg6Eu+wo=P0kUDHCs_N2K=-qDeZ02sMX2wE+48snr9i2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:16:41 +0300
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Pieter Jansen van Vuuren 
        <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] nfp: add a stats handler for flower offloads

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Simon Horman
<simon.horman@...ronome.com> wrote:
> From: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
>
> Previously there was no way of updating flow rule stats after they
> have been offloaded to hardware. This is solved by keeping track of
> stats received from hardware and providing this to the TC handler
> on request.

> +static void
> +nfp_flower_update_stats(struct nfp_app *app, struct nfp_fl_stats_frame *stats)
> +{
> +       struct nfp_fl_payload *nfp_flow;
> +       unsigned long flower_cookie;
> +
> +       flower_cookie = be64_to_cpu(stats->stats_cookie);
> +
> +       rcu_read_lock();
> +       nfp_flow = nfp_flower_find_in_fl_table(app, flower_cookie);
> +       if (!nfp_flow)
> +               goto exit_rcu_unlock;
> +
> +       if (nfp_flow->meta.host_ctx_id != stats->stats_con_id)
> +               goto exit_rcu_unlock;
> +
> +       spin_lock(&nfp_flow->lock);
> +       nfp_flow->stats.pkts += be32_to_cpu(stats->pkt_count);
> +       nfp_flow->stats.bytes += be64_to_cpu(stats->byte_count);

you're using += with the values you get form the fw, are they incremental?

> +       nfp_flow->stats.used = jiffies;

if nothing was changed since your last reading, it's wrong to say that
used == NOW

> +       spin_unlock(&nfp_flow->lock);

if indeed you need to keep a clone of earlier calls to correctly
compute the (last)used value,
maybe you can get rid of the locking?