netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] nfp: add control message passing capabilities to flower offloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMjhJYQTnFdHJuMcHR=n3MLa=+SAycVZ3ZCQbCWoU8EbJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:21:53 +0300
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Pieter Jansen van Vuuren 
        <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] nfp: add control message passing
 capabilities to flower offloads

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Simon Horman
<simon.horman@...ronome.com> wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/cmsg.h
> @@ -245,7 +245,11 @@ struct nfp_flower_cmsg_hdr {
>
>  /* Types defined for port related control messages  */
>  enum nfp_flower_cmsg_type_port {
> +       NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_TYPE_FLOW_ADD =         0,
> +       NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_TYPE_FLOW_MOD =         1,

AFAIU flower offload will always use delete and add and not modify,
if you think otherwise, would love to hear that. Didn't see you are using
the MOD define in the code anywhere.