[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170717.085915.556973296335189682.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, fw@...len.de, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] inetpeer: remove AVL implementation in favor
of RB tree
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 02:56:10 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> As discussed in Faro during Netfilter Workshop 2017, RB trees can be
> used with RCU, using a seqlock.
>
> Note that net/rxrpc/conn_service.c is already using this.
>
> This patch converts inetpeer from AVL tree to RB tree, since it allows
> to remove private AVL implementation in favor of shared RB code.
>
> $ size net/ipv4/inetpeer.before net/ipv4/inetpeer.after
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 3195 40 128 3363 d23 net/ipv4/inetpeer.before
> 1562 24 0 1586 632 net/ipv4/inetpeer.after
>
> The same technique can be used to speed up
> net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c (removing rwlock contention in fast path)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks for doing this Eric.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists