[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170729.232404.59056988159960653.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 23:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: linville@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vidya.chowdary@...il.com, dustin@...ulusnetworks.com,
olson@...ulusnetworks.com, leedom@...lsio.com, kubakici@...pl,
galp@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch, manojmalviya@...lsio.com,
santosh@...lsio.com, yuval.mintz@...gic.com, odedw@...lanox.com,
ariela@...lanox.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ethtool: support for forward error
correction mode setting on a link
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:47:25 -0700
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> Forward Error Correction (FEC) modes i.e Base-R
> and Reed-Solomon modes are introduced in 25G/40G/100G standards
> for providing good BER at high speeds. Various networking devices
> which support 25G/40G/100G provides ability to manage supported FEC
> modes and the lack of FEC encoding control and reporting today is a
> source for interoperability issues for many vendors.
> FEC capability as well as specific FEC mode i.e. Base-R
> or RS modes can be requested or advertised through bits D44:47 of base link
> codeword.
>
> This patch set intends to provide option under ethtool to manage and
> report FEC encoding settings for networking devices as per IEEE 802.3
> bj, bm and by specs.
>
> v2 :
> - minor patch format fixes and typos pointed out by Andrew
> - there was a pending discussion on the use of 'auto' vs
> 'automatic' for fec settings. I have left it as 'auto'
> because in most cases today auto is used in place of
> automatic to represent automatically generated values.
> We use it in other networking config too. I would prefer
> leaving it as auto.
Series applied to net-next, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists