netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ethtool: support for forward error correction mode setting on a link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:30:55 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vidya Sagar Ravipati <vidya.chowdary@...il.com>,
        Dustin Byford <dustin@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Dave Olson <olson@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com>,
        Gal Pressman <galp@...lanox.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Manoj Malviya <manojmalviya@...lsio.com>,
        Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>, yuval.mintz@...gic.com,
        odedw@...lanox.com, Ariel Almog <ariela@...lanox.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] ethtool: support for forward error
 correction mode setting on a link

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:28:26 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 07:53:01 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:  
> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:  
> >> > On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:47:25 -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:  
> >> >> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> Forward Error Correction (FEC) modes i.e Base-R
> >> >> and Reed-Solomon modes are introduced in 25G/40G/100G standards
> >> >> for providing good BER at high speeds. Various networking devices
> >> >> which support 25G/40G/100G provides ability to manage supported FEC
> >> >> modes and the lack of FEC encoding control and reporting today is a
> >> >> source for interoperability issues for many vendors.
> >> >> FEC capability as well as specific FEC mode i.e. Base-R
> >> >> or RS modes can be requested or advertised through bits D44:47 of base link
> >> >> codeword.
> >> >>
> >> >> This patch set intends to provide option under ethtool to manage and
> >> >> report FEC encoding settings for networking devices as per IEEE 802.3
> >> >> bj, bm and by specs.
> >> >>
> >> >> v2 :
> >> >>         - minor patch format fixes and typos pointed out by Andrew
> >> >>         - there was a pending discussion on the use of 'auto' vs
> >> >>           'automatic' for fec settings. I have left it as 'auto'
> >> >>           because in most cases today auto is used in place of
> >> >>           automatic to represent automatically generated values.
> >> >>           We use it in other networking config too. I would prefer
> >> >>           leaving it as auto.  
> >> >
> >> > On the subject of resetting the values when module is replugged I
> >> > assume what was previously described remains:
> >> >  - we always allow users to set the FEC regardless of the module type;
> >> >  - if user set an incorrect FEC for the module type (or module gets
> >> >    swapped) the link will be administratively taken down by either
> >> >    the driver or FW.
> >> >
> >> > Is that correct?  Am I misremembering?  
> >>
> >> yes, correct. And possible future sfp hotplug events can give user-space
> >> more info to react to module type changes etc.  
> >
> > OK, if nobody else objects and we go with that - lets make sure we
> > document clearly those are expected :)  My concern is that if there is
> > ever 10G + RS FEC standard we don't want to end up in a situation where
> > some drivers silently ignore FEC settings in 10G and other apply it.
> > So let's make it clear what the intended Linux behaviour is.  It could
> > be in the ethtool man page, or the kernel somewhere.  
> 
> sure :), ack. We will document it in the ethtool manpage.

Hi Roopa!  Did you ever publish the ethtool user space patches at all?
I can't find them...