[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWRo1HG8WpZ-0zNferBe44yFpwoLpNWn5CKv9YuD9TKBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:37:21 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 04/20] net: sched: use tcf_exts_has_actions in tcf_exts_exec
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> +static inline int
> +tcf_exts_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_exts *exts,
> + struct tcf_result *res)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> + if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))
> + return tcf_action_exec(skb, exts->actions, exts->nr_actions,
> + res);
> +#endif
> + return 0;
> +}
While you are on it, can we get rid of this macro too?
tcf_action_exec() is only defined with CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT,
not sure if compiler is kind enough to eliminate the false branch
for us:
if (false)
return tcf_action_exec(...); // not defined but the branch is dead
At least you can add a wrapper for tcf_action_exec() to just
return 0.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists