netdev - Re: [patch net-next 04/20] net: sched: use tcf_exts_has_actions in tcf_exts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170731122320.GE1883@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:23:20 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 04/20] net: sched: use tcf_exts_has_actions in
 tcf_exts_exec

Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:09:22PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>On 17-07-31 02:36 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:48:24PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>> > I am probably missing something. All those changes to just
>> > replace "if (exts->nr_actions)" with "if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))" ?
>> 
>> That is what the description says :)
>> 
>
>I meant I wouldve expected few liners added/removed.

one actually. But the function tcf_exts_exec had to be moved since
tcf_exts_has_actions was defined after originaly

>
>cheers,
>jamal