[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170806.230901.1220176297368809463.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 23:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
amritha.nambiar@...el.com, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/15] net: sched: summer cleanup part 2,
ndo_setup_tc
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:27:34 +0200
> Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:37:49AM CEST, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>>Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:53:22 +0200
>>
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>
>>> This patchset focuses on ndo_setup_tc and its args.
>>> Currently there are couple of things that do not make much sense.
>>> The type is passed in struct tc_to_netdev, but as it is always
>>> required, should be arg of the ndo. Other things are passed as args
>>> but they are only relevant for cls offloads and not mqprio. Therefore,
>>> they should be pushed to struct. As the tc_to_netdev struct in the end
>>> is just a container of single pointer, we get rid of it and pass the
>>> struct according to type. So in the end, we have:
>>> ndo_setup_tc(dev, type, type_data_struct)
>>>
>>> There are couple of cosmetics done on the way to make things smooth.
>>> Also, reported error is consolidated to eopnotsupp in case the
>>> asked offload is not supported.
>>
>>Series applied, thanks Jiri.
>
> Pushed this already? I just got an email from kbuildbot, I missed hns3pf
> driver (3 days). I can send the fix as followup as well. Up to you.
Luckily I didn't push yet, please respin with hns3pf fixed, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists