[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5995BE4D.10503@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:03:25 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, davem@...emloft.net
CC: ast@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: don't enable preemption twice in smap_do_verdict
On 08/17/2017 08:22 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> In smap_do_verdict(), the fall-through branch leads to call
> preempt_enable() twice for the SK_REDIRECT, which creates an
> imbalance. Only enable it for all remaining cases again.
>
> Fixes: 174a79ff9515 ("bpf: sockmap with sk redirect support")
> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> index f7e5e6c..39de541 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
> /* Fall through and free skb otherwise */
> case SK_DROP:
> default:
> - preempt_enable();
> + if (rc != SK_REDIRECT)
> + preempt_enable();
> kfree_skb(skb);
> }
> }
>
Yep looks good, nice catch Alexei. Thanks! I'll add a selftests entry
in test_maps to catch this fall through case. Looks like we don't hit
this case during selftests at the moment.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists