[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d38cac6d-77a7-e411-73b0-78adad9cbd5f@mellanox.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 13:27:14 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
mlindner@...vell.com, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] mlx4: sizeof style usage
Thanks Stephen.
Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation.
I know this is already accepted, but still I have one comment.
On 15/08/2017 8:29 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The kernel coding style is to treat sizeof as a function
> (ie. with parenthesis) not as an operator.
>
> Also use kcalloc and kmalloc_array
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> ---
> @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static int mlx4_eq_int(struct mlx4_dev *dev, struct mlx4_eq *eq)
> }
> memcpy(&priv->mfunc.master.comm_arm_bit_vector,
> eqe->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec,
> - sizeof eqe->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec);
> + sizeof(eqe)->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec);
I think the brackets here are misplaced.
Shouldn't they be as follows?
sizeof(eqe->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec));
> queue_work(priv->mfunc.master.comm_wq,
> &priv->mfunc.master.comm_work);
> break;
Thanks,
Tariq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists