[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM2PR21MB0074E2B2C697B1300B77EFEACC860@DM2PR21MB0074.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 18:00:27 +0000
From: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"mlindner@...vell.com" <mlindner@...vell.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/4] mlx4: sizeof style usage
Yes, good catch.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tariq Toukan [mailto:tariqt@...lanox.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 3:27 AM
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>; mlindner@...vell.com; mst@...hat.com; jasowang@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] mlx4: sizeof style usage
[You don't often get email from TARIQT@...LANOX.COM. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]
Thanks Stephen.
Sorry for the late reply, I was on vacation.
I know this is already accepted, but still I have one comment.
On 15/08/2017 8:29 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The kernel coding style is to treat sizeof as a function
> (ie. with parenthesis) not as an operator.
>
> Also use kcalloc and kmalloc_array
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> ---
> @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static int mlx4_eq_int(struct mlx4_dev *dev, struct mlx4_eq *eq)
> }
> memcpy(&priv->mfunc.master.comm_arm_bit_vector,
> eqe->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec,
> - sizeof eqe->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec);
> + sizeof(eqe)->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec);
I think the brackets here are misplaced.
Shouldn't they be as follows?
sizeof(eqe->event.comm_channel_arm.bit_vec));
> queue_work(priv->mfunc.master.comm_wq,
> &priv->mfunc.master.comm_work);
> break;
Thanks,
Tariq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists