netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] openvswitch: enable NSH support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170821084101.GB74649@cran64.bj.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:41:02 +0800
From:   "Yang, Yi" <yi.y.yang@...el.com>
To:     Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, blp@....org,
        e@...g.me, jan.scheurich@...csson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] openvswitch: enable NSH support

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:25:09AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:54:23 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> > v4->v5
> >  - Fix many comments by Jiri Benc and Eric Garver
> >    for v4.
> 
> NACK for v5, we haven't finished discussing v4. You're sending new
> versions too quickly.
> 
> My comment about sending a new version was meant only for the rest of
> the patch that I have not reviewed - i.e. that once the comments I've
> made so far are addressed, I'm fine with continuing reviewing in a new
> version.
> 
> It did not mean that I'm okay with sending a new version without my
> comments to the first part being addressed. Which they are not, see my
> reply to your mail at v4.
> 
> Sorry if that was not clear but I won't review v5 until we have
> conclusion for the v4 comments.

Ok, let me fix comments for v4 first.

> 
>  Jiri