netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Endian fixes for SYSTEMPORT/SF2/MDIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170829.145203.2052260546778215324.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, opendmb@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Endian fixes for SYSTEMPORT/SF2/MDIO

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:45:30 -0700

> On 08/29/2017 02:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:39:41 -0700
>> 
>>> While trying an ARM BE kernel for kinks, the 3 drivers below started not
>>> working and the reasons why became pretty obvious because the register space
>>> remains LE (hardwired), except for Broadcom MIPS where it follows the CPU's
>>> native endian (let's call that a feature).
>> 
>> Series applied, thanks Florian.
> 
> If you have not pushed yet, seems like not, can you check you applied v2
> of this patch series, in particular this patch:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/807296/

If you didn't keep messing with the patchwork state of patches in my
queue this confusion would not have happened.

I did happen to apply v2, but because of all of the confusion you keep
creating, I used the header message from v1.

It's already pushed out so there is nothing we can do about it.