[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170829.145340.1262408275355867443.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dsahern@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/8] bpf: Add option to set mark and
priority in cgroup sock programs
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:05:33 -0700
> Add option to set mark and priority in addition to bound device for newly
> created sockets. Also, allow the bpf programs to use the get_current_uid_gid
> helper meaning socket marks, priority and device can be set base on the
> uid/gid of the running process.
>
> For flexbility in deploying these programs, option is added to allow cgroups
> to be walked from current to root running any program attached. This allows
> one cgroup level to control the device a socket is bound to (e.g, a VRF) while
> cgroups can be used to set socket marks and priority.
>
> Sample programs are updated to demonstrate the new options.
>
> v2
> - added flag to control recursive behavior as requested by Alexei
> - added comment to sock_filter_func_proto regarding use of
> get_current_uid_gid helper
> - updated test programs for recursive option
I'm marking this patch series as "deferred" while the semantic issues
keep getting discussed.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists