netdev - [net 2/2] i40e: point wb_desc at the nvm_wb_desc during i40e_read_nvm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170906010418.39007-3-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date:   Tue,  5 Sep 2017 18:04:18 -0700
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net 2/2] i40e: point wb_desc at the nvm_wb_desc during i40e_read_nvm_aq

From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>

When introducing the functions to read the NVM through the AdminQ, we
did not correctly mark the wb_desc.

Fixes: 7073f46e443e ("i40e: Add AQ commands for NVM Update for X722", 2015-06-05)
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.c
index 154ba49c2c6f..26d7e9fe6220 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.c
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static i40e_status i40e_read_nvm_aq(struct i40e_hw *hw, u8 module_pointer,
 	struct i40e_asq_cmd_details cmd_details;
 
 	memset(&cmd_details, 0, sizeof(cmd_details));
+	cmd_details.wb_desc = &hw->nvm_wb_desc;
 
 	/* Here we are checking the SR limit only for the flat memory model.
 	 * We cannot do it for the module-based model, as we did not acquire
-- 
2.14.1