[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7e09201-40c2-933a-1e8e-a31eddcc75ab@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:08:48 +0800
From: liujian <liujian56@...wei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<ycheng@...gle.com>, <hkchu@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
wangkefeng 00227729 <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer()
Hi,
In the scenario, tcp server side IP changed, and at that memont,
userspace application still send data continuously;
tcp_send_head(sk)'s timestamp always be refreshed.
Here is the packetdrill script:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7>
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65530
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
+0 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 > P. 1:25(24) ack 1 win 229
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 25 win 65530
//change the ipaddress
+1 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.10/16`
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.1/16`
+0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
+0 write(4, ..., 24) = -1
[root@...alhost ~]# time ./gtests/net/packetdrill/packetdrill test.pkt
test.pkt:50: runtime error in write call: Expected result -1 but got 24 with errno 2 (No such file or directory)
real 1m11.364s
user 0m0.028s
sys 0m0.106s
[root@...alhost ~]# netstat -toen
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State User Inode Timer
tcp 0 504 192.168.0.1:8080 192.0.2.1:33993 ESTABLISHED 0 45453 probe (22.38/0/7)
since the script didn't wait for enough time, here only got 7 probes.
在 2017/9/11 23:22, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 08:13 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> You can see we got only 3 probes, not 4.
>
> Here is complete packetdrill test showing that code behaves as expected.
>
> 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
> +0 listen(3, 1) = 0
>
> +0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8>
>
> // Client advertises a zero receive window, so we can't send.
> +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
> +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
>
> +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
> +0 write(4, ..., 2920) = 2920
>
> // Window probes are scheduled just like RTOs.
> +.3~+.31 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> +.6~+.62 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> +1.2~+1.24 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
>
> // Peer opens its window too late !
> +3 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
> +0 > R 1:1(0)
>
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists