[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1505228700.15310.138.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 08:05:00 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: liujian <liujian56@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, hkchu@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, weiyongjun1@...wei.com,
wangkefeng 00227729 <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer()
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 14:08 +0800, liujian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the scenario, tcp server side IP changed, and at that memont,
> userspace application still send data continuously;
> tcp_send_head(sk)'s timestamp always be refreshed.
>
> Here is the packetdrill script:
>
> 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
> +0 listen(3, 1) = 0
>
> +0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7>
>
> +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65530
> +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
>
> +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
> +0 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +0 > P. 1:25(24) ack 1 win 229
> +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 25 win 65530
>
> //change the ipaddress
> +1 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.10/16`
>
> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
>
> +0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.1/16`
> +0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
> +0 write(4, ..., 24) = -1
>
>
This has nothing to do with the code patch you have changed.
How have you tested your patch exactly ?
> [root@...alhost ~]# time ./gtests/net/packetdrill/packetdrill test.pkt
> test.pkt:50: runtime error in write call: Expected result -1 but got 24 with errno 2 (No such file or directory)
>
> real 1m11.364s
> user 0m0.028s
> sys 0m0.106s
>
> [root@...alhost ~]# netstat -toen
> Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State User Inode Timer
> tcp 0 504 192.168.0.1:8080 192.0.2.1:33993 ESTABLISHED 0 45453 probe (22.38/0/7)
>
> since the script didn't wait for enough time, here only got 7 probes.
>
> 在 2017/9/11 23:22, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> > On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 08:13 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> >> You can see we got only 3 probes, not 4.
> >
> > Here is complete packetdrill test showing that code behaves as expected.
> >
> > 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> > +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> > +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
> > +0 listen(3, 1) = 0
> >
> > +0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
> > +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8>
> >
> > // Client advertises a zero receive window, so we can't send.
> > +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
> > +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
> >
> > +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
> > +0 write(4, ..., 2920) = 2920
> >
> > // Window probes are scheduled just like RTOs.
> > +.3~+.31 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> > +.6~+.62 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> > +1.2~+1.24 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> >
> > // Peer opens its window too late !
> > +3 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
> > +0 > R 1:1(0)
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists