[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B8C6A191C@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:13:41 +0000
From: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lennart Sorensen" <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/5] e1000e: Fix wrong comment related
to link detection
> From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@...osl.org] On Behalf
> Of Benjamin Poirier
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 11:36 AM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/5] e1000e: Fix wrong comment related to
> link detection
>
> Reading e1000e_check_for_copper_link() shows that get_link_status is set to
> false after link has been detected. Therefore, it stays TRUE until then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists