[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMjOkF7vKHY=+q1dHXGdsyEXFPUa6dsGD_-M3+TX=DNouA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:17:02 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] nfp: flower vxlan tunnel offload
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:41:37 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Please note that the way the rule is being set to the HW driver is by delegation
>> done in flower, see these commits (specifically "Add offload support
>> using egress Hardware device")
>
> It's very well possible the bug is somewhere in net/sched.
maybe before/instead you call it a bug, take a look on the design
there and maybe
tell us how to possibly do that otherwise?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists