netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59CADA6C.1000300@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:53:32 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, davem@...emloft.net
CC:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
        ys114321@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] bpf/verifier: improve disassembly of
 BPF_NEG instructions

On 09/26/2017 05:35 PM, Edward Cree wrote:
> BPF_NEG takes only one operand, unlike the bulk of BPF_ALU[64] which are
>   compound-assignments.  So give it its own format in print_bpf_insn().
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>