[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170928.102453.506974154025585871.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ecree@...arflare.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, ys114321@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] bpf/verifier: disassembly improvements
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:32:15 +0100
> Fix the output of print_bpf_insn() for ALU ops that don't look like
> compound assignment (i.e. BPF_END and BPF_NEG).
>
> Sample output for a short test program:
> 0: (b4) (u32) r0 = (u32) 0
> 1: (dc) r0 = be32 r0
> 2: (84) r0 = (u32) -r0
> 3: (95) exit
> processed 4 insns, stack depth 0
Series applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists