[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170927090315.22070171@brouer.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:03:34 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
peter.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] bpf: update bpf.h uapi header for tools
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:25:52 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> Looks like a couple of updates missed to get carried into tools/include/uapi/,
> so copy the bpf.h header as usual to pull in latest updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 461811e..e43491a 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -143,12 +143,6 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
>
> #define MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
>
> -enum bpf_sockmap_flags {
> - BPF_SOCKMAP_UNSPEC,
> - BPF_SOCKMAP_STRPARSER,
> - __MAX_BPF_SOCKMAP_FLAG
> -};
> -
Why does "bpf_sockmap_flags" gets removed?
It got added in: commit 69e8cc134bcb ("bpf: sockmap sample program").
But I cannot find any users of these flags, so I guess it is okay.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists