[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170928111232.GT3149@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:12:32 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
CC: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: don't call xfrm_policy_cache_flush under
xfrm_state_lock
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:31:03PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com> wrote:
> > I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required
> > for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both
> > "sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular
> > locking dependency detected" warnings on flush.
> >
> > Fixes: ec30d78c14a8 xfrm: add xdst pcpu cache
> > Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
>
> You're right, its not needed (and wrong).
>
> Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Applied to the ipsec tree, thanks everyone!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists