netdev - Re: [PATCH] xfrm: don't call xfrm_policy_cache_flush under xfrm_state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:12:32 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
CC:     Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: don't call xfrm_policy_cache_flush under
 xfrm_state_lock

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:31:03PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com> wrote:
> > I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required
> > for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both
> > "sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular
> > locking dependency detected" warnings on flush.
> > 
> > Fixes: ec30d78c14a8 xfrm: add xdst pcpu cache
> > Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
> 
> You're right, its not needed (and wrong).
> 
> Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

Applied to the ipsec tree, thanks everyone!