lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lgkxl413.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:04:56 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: dsa: directly fetch switch in lan9303_rcv

Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

>> @@ -72,11 +72,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *lan9303_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
>>  {
>>  	u16 *lan9303_tag;
>>  	struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = dev->dsa_ptr;
>> -	struct dsa_switch *ds;
>> +	struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp;
>> +	struct dsa_switch *ds = cpu_dp->ds;
>>  	unsigned int source_port;
>>  
>> -	ds = dst->ds[0];
>> -
>>  	if (unlikely(!ds)) {
>>  		dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev, "Dropping packet, due to missing DSA switch device\n");
>>  		return NULL;
>
> Similarly to the patch before, you can probably drop this test, I don't
> actually see how we could trigger it.

Good catch, I'll respin after eventually more reviews.


Thanks,

        Vivien

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ