[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171003112948.44d9cc56@xeon-e3>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:29:48 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] bridge: add new BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port
flag to suppress arp and nd flood
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:21:14 -0700
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> index 48fb174..7a50dc5 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,8 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
> /* Do not flood to ports that enable proxy ARP */
> if (p->flags & BR_PROXYARP)
> continue;
> - if ((p->flags & BR_PROXYARP_WIFI) &&
> + if ((p->flags & BR_PROXYARP_WIFI ||
> + p->flags & BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS) &&
> BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->proxyarp_replied)
> continue;
Don;t you need additional paren here to avoid warnings.
Or do one mask:
if ((p->flags & (BR_PROXYARP_WIFI | BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS)) &&
BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->proxyarp_replied)
continue;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists