[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171006.232229.74190380417429379.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 23:22:29 +0100 (WEST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: u9012063@...il.com
Cc: David.Laight@...lab.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lucien.xin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip_gre: check packet length and mtu correctly
in erspan_fb_xmit
From: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:09:29 -0700
> Yes, adding another field in the struct net_device can avoid the
> arithmetic operation. I'm not sure it's a good idea to add new field
> since there are already a lot in net_device. Let's wait to see how
> others think.
Why would you add it to net_device when you can add it to ip_tunnel?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists