netdev - Re: [PATCH] tracing: bpf: Hide bpf trace events when they are not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171016.211106.146432024027343504.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:11:06 +0100 (WEST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: bpf: Hide bpf trace events when they are not
 used

From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:01:25 -0400

> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 20:54:34 +0100 (WEST)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
>> Steven, I lost track of how this patch is being handled.
>> 
>> Do you want me to merge it via my net-next tree?
> 
> If you want. I could take it too if you give me an ack. It's not
> dependent on any other changes so it doesn't matter which way it goes. I
> know Alexei was thinking about doing the same for xdp but those appear
> to be used even without BPF_SYSCALLS.

Ok, applied to my net-next tree and if you want to apply it to your's
too, here is the ACK:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>