[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171018.122113.2048778528438796236.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:21:13 +0100 (WEST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net] mlxsw: core: Fix possible deadlock
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:28:28 +0200
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
>
> When an EMAD is transmitted, a timeout work item is scheduled with a
> delay of 200ms, so that another EMAD will be retried until a maximum of
> five retries.
>
> In certain situations, it's possible for the function waiting on the
> EMAD to be associated with a work item that is queued on the same
> workqueue (`mlxsw_core`) as the timeout work item. This results in
> flushing a work item on the same workqueue.
>
> According to commit e159489baa71 ("workqueue: relax lockdep annotation
> on flush_work()") the above may lead to a deadlock in case the workqueue
> has only one worker active or if the system in under memory pressure and
> the rescue worker is in use. The latter explains the very rare and
> random nature of the lockdep splats we have been seeing:
...
> Fix this by creating another workqueue for EMAD timeouts, thereby
> preventing the situation of a work item trying to flush a work item
> queued on the same workqueue.
>
> Fixes: caf7297e7ab5f ("mlxsw: core: Introduce support for asynchronous EMAD register access")
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists