[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iL-tcPUVDREwXCUR4hxVTBCP2HYJLzPGUGMTh5dpe0C6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:01:35 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Wei Wei <dotweiba@...il.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: v4.14-rc3/arm64 DABT exception in atomic_inc() / __skb_clone()
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> From skb->dev and netdev_priv, the tun device has flags 0x1002 ==
> IFF_TAP | IFF_NO_PI. This kernel precedes the recent support for
> IFF_NAPI and IFF_NAPI_FRAGS. The allocation most likely happened
> in tun_build_skb from current->task_frag. It would be a previous
> allocation that left alloc_frag->offset unaligned. But perhaps this code
> needs to perform alignment before setting skb->head. At least on
> platforms where atomic on dataref must be aligned.
+1
Bug added in commit 66ccbc9c87c2 ("tap: use build_skb() for small packet")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists