netdev - v6/sit tunnels and VRFs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL6e_pdXJFoVVCfAOc9D_kE73juGQzjoUueEBvEMS=cq5CDKkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:45:18 -0400
From:   Jeff Barnhill <0xeffeff@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: v6/sit tunnels and VRFs

Are v6/sit tunnels working with VRFs?

For instance, I have a very simple configuration with three VMs
running 4.13.0-16 (Ubuntu Server 17.10) kernels.  VM3 is setup as a
router for separation.  VM1 and VM2 have static routes to each other
via VM3.  All VMs have v4 interfaces configured.  If I setup a sit
tunnel with v6 addrs from V1 to V2, tunneled data flows as expected
(verified with ping) and can be seen via tcpdump on VM3.  However, if
I create a VRF on VM2 and enslave the v4 interface and tunnel to that
VRF, data does not leave VM2 and ping displays "Destination Host
Unreachable".  I did verify that basic v4 ping works between VM1 and
VM2 with the v4 interface on VM2 enslaved to VRF device.

If this should work, I can provide more details with configuration commands.

Thanks,
Jeff