netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Move struct lan9303 to include/linux/lan9303.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55972b2d-3d4e-b899-4baf-ad5252421de2@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:07:54 +0200
From:   Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Move struct lan9303 to
 include/linux/lan9303.h

On 24. okt. 2017 18:31, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:35:14AM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
>> The next patch require net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c to access struct lan9303.
>> Therefore move struct lan9303 definitions from drivers/net/dsa/lan9303.h
>> to new file include/linux/lan9303.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@...l-hjelmeland.no>
> 
> O.K, so not too bad.
> 
> I am now however wondering if include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h would be
> better?
> 

Me too. I can do that.


> Anyway,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> 
>      Andrew
> 

Egil