[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171025121503.GA1910@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:15:03 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, idosch@...lanox.com,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/20] net: sched: convert cls ndo_setup_tc
offload calls to per-block callbacks
Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 06:01:34PM CEST, alexander.duyck@...il.com wrote:
[...]
>1. To offload filter into HW, the hw-tc-offload feature flag has
>to be turned on before creating the ingress qdisc.
>
>Previously, this could also be turned on after the qdisc was created
>and the filters could still be offloaded. Looks like this is because,
>previously the offload flag was checked as a part of filter
>integration in the classifier, and now it is checked as part of qdisc
>creation (ingress_init). So, if no offload capability is advertised at
>ingress qdisc creation time then hardware will not be asked to offload
>filters later if the flag is enabled.
I have patchset that fixes this in my queue now. Will do some smoke
testing and send later today.
>
>2. Deleting the ingress qdisc fails to remove filters added in
>HW. Filters in SW gets deleted.
>
>We haven’t exactly root-caused this, the changes being extensive, but
>our guess is again something wrong with the offload check or similar
>while unregistering the block callback (tcf_block_cb_unregister) and
>further to the classifier (CLS_U32/CLS_FLOWER etc.) with the
>DESTROY/REMOVE command.
Hmm. How does this worked previously. I mean, do you see change of
behaviour? I'm asking because I don't see how rules added only to HW
could be removed, driver should care of it. Or are you talking about
rules added to both SW and HW?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists