[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171101173825.7008-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:38:23 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/2] nfp: bpf: rename ALU_OP_NEG and support BPF_NEG
Jiong says:
Compilers are starting to use BPF_NEG, for example LLVM. However, NFP
does not support JITing it. This patch set adds this. Unit test is added
as well.
Meanwhile, the current NFP_ALU_NEG is actually doing bitwise NOT (one's
complement) operation, so the name is misleading. This patch set corrects
this.
Jiong Wang (2):
nfp: bpf: rename ALU_OP_NEG to ALU_OP_NOT
nfp: bpf: support [BPF_ALU | BPF_ALU64] | BPF_NEG
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_asm.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists