netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/2] nfp: bpf: support [BPF_ALU | BPF_ALU64]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171101173825.7008-3-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date:   Wed,  1 Nov 2017 10:38:25 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     oss-drivers@...ronome.com, Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] nfp: bpf: support [BPF_ALU | BPF_ALU64] | BPF_NEG

From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>

This patch supports BPF_NEG under both BPF_ALU64 and BPF_ALU. LLVM recently
starts to generate it.

NOTE: BPF_NEG takes single operand which is an register and serve as both
input and output.

Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index 369173100fcf..2609a2487100 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -1218,6 +1218,18 @@ static int sub_imm64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int neg_reg64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
+{
+	const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
+
+	emit_alu(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2), reg_imm(0),
+		 ALU_OP_SUB, reg_b(insn->dst_reg * 2));
+	emit_alu(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1), reg_imm(0),
+		 ALU_OP_SUB_C, reg_b(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int shl_imm64(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
 {
 	const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
@@ -1338,6 +1350,16 @@ static int sub_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
 	return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB, !meta->insn.imm);
 }
 
+static int neg_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
+{
+	u8 dst = meta->insn.dst_reg * 2;
+
+	emit_alu(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_imm(0), ALU_OP_SUB, reg_b(dst));
+	wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(meta->insn.dst_reg * 2 + 1), 0);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int shl_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
 {
 	const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
@@ -1847,6 +1869,7 @@ static const instr_cb_t instr_cb[256] = {
 	[BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K] =	add_imm64,
 	[BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_X] =	sub_reg64,
 	[BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K] =	sub_imm64,
+	[BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG] =		neg_reg64,
 	[BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K] =	shl_imm64,
 	[BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K] =	shr_imm64,
 	[BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X] =	mov_reg,
@@ -1861,6 +1884,7 @@ static const instr_cb_t instr_cb[256] = {
 	[BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K] =	add_imm,
 	[BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_X] =	sub_reg,
 	[BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K] =	sub_imm,
+	[BPF_ALU | BPF_NEG] =		neg_reg,
 	[BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K] =	shl_imm,
 	[BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_X] =	end_reg32,
 	[BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW] =	imm_ld8,
-- 
2.14.1