[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171104.091831.822922406654465563.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 09:18:31 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: felix.manlunas@...ium.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, raghu.vatsavayi@...ium.com,
derek.chickles@...ium.com, satananda.burla@...ium.com,
vijaya.guvva@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] liquidio: Fix an issue with multiple
switchdev enable disables
From: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:17:44 -0700
> From: Vijaya Mohan Guvva <vijaya.guvva@...ium.com>
>
> Return success if the same dispatch function is being registered for
> a given opcode and subcode, there by allow multiple switchdev enable
> and disables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Mohan Guvva <vijaya.guvva@...ium.com>
> Signed-off-by: Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...ium.com>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...ium.com>
Applied, thanks.
But I do have a question, are you properly reference counting these
dispatch function objects? I can't see how you can properly handle
multiple enable/disable otherwise.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists