[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27b9b208-4434-77e7-41e3-53453cc35863@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 13:52:25 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Remi Denis-Courmont <courmisch@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/21] phonet: exit_net cleanup check added
On 2017-11-05 13:17, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le 5 novembre 2017 12:02:34 GMT+02:00, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> a écrit :
>> Be sure that pndevs.list initialized in net_init hook was return
>> to initial state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> net/phonet/pn_dev.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/phonet/pn_dev.c b/net/phonet/pn_dev.c
>> index 2cb4c5d..1024851 100644
>> --- a/net/phonet/pn_dev.c
>> +++ b/net/phonet/pn_dev.c
>> @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ static int __net_init phonet_init_net(struct net
>> *net)
>> static void __net_exit phonet_exit_net(struct net *net)
>> {
>> remove_proc_entry("phonet", net->proc_net);
>> + WARN(!list_empty(&pnn->pndevs.list),
>> + "net %p exit: phonet pndevs.list is not empty\n", net);
>> }
>>
>> static struct pernet_operations phonet_net_ops = {
>
> Hello,
>
> TBH, I am not clear what the benefit of this is supposed to be... also, does this not leak a pointer to userspace, breaking ASLR?
Dear Rémi,
I assume that elements added into per-netns list should not live longer then netns.
Such check allows to be sure that driver works with list correctly and lost no entries.
Many drivers does it already, and my current patch sent just makes this praxis global.
I doubt that pointer to freed net have value for someone except developers,
on the other hand it helps to speed up the problem investigation.
Thank you,
Vasily Averin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists