[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33ec9840-dc31-6b01-bd8c-0d42254951e1@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 08:02:37 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: imanti.mendez@...cle.com, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com,
lldp-devel@...n-lldp.org, Valentin.Vidic@...Net.hr
Subject: Re: [lldp-devel] Fwd: [PATCH RESEND] Fix segfault on "lldptool -t -i
eth2 -V PFC -c enabled"
On 11/07/2017 04:56 PM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
>
> We are trying to use DCBX via lldpad for some of our applications,
> and finding/fixing bugs and enhancements as we go.
>
> However our attempts to upstream these fixes is encountering silence
> from the lldp-devel list e.g.,
> http://lists.open-lldp.org/pipermail/lldp-devel/2017-October/001252.html
>
> Any suggestions on available options for the care and feeding of lldpad?
>
> There must be other users/maintainers of DCBX implementations- could you
> please share your experiences in this space?
>
We tried to get the list maintainership moved to over to us by the time
Intel decided to drop FCoE. But for some reasons this never worked out,
so while the list is technically alive we don't have any means of
managing it.
Maybe we should be moving it to somewhere else.
But yes, we _do_ take fixes for it.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists