netdev - Re: [lldp-devel] Fwd: [PATCH RESEND] Fix segfault on "lldptool -t -i eth2 -V PFC -c enabled"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2017 04:24:48 -0500
From:   Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, imanti.mendez@...cle.com,
        santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, lldp-devel@...n-lldp.org,
        Valentin.Vidic@...Net.hr
Subject: Re: [lldp-devel] Fwd: [PATCH RESEND] Fix segfault on "lldptool -t -i
 eth2 -V PFC -c enabled"

On (11/08/17 08:02), Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> We tried to get the list maintainership moved to over to us by the time
> Intel decided to drop FCoE. But for some reasons this never worked out,
> so while the list is technically alive we don't have any means of
> managing it.
> Maybe we should be moving it to somewhere else.

I'd support that.. any thoughts on where to move it to?

> But yes, we _do_ take fixes for it.

I just tried setting up a git pull-request for this to Valentin's repo,
I'm not sure if I followed procedures correctly (sending text patches to 
a list comes more naturally to me, and I may have fat-fingered something)

To whom should I send this patch? 

We also have a couple of other patches in the pipeline that we are
testing, so setting up a mailing list would be welcomed!

--Sowmini