netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/3] nfp act_vlan: Rewrite of the TC vlan action to use the RCU, and incorporated review comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171110.223927.1443156497798523005.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:39:27 +0900 (KST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kurup.manish@...il.com
Cc:     jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        aring@...atatu.com, mrv@...atatu.com, manish.kurup@...izon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/3] nfp act_vlan: Rewrite of the TC vlan
 action to use the RCU, and incorporated review comments

From: Manish Kurup <kurup.manish@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:30:09 -0500

> The last version I sent out (with changes for comments), was v10, But
> I noticed that you applied v7 (without the reverse xmas tree patch on
> patch #3).

Check my tree, I actually applied a later version than v7.

Sorry for the confusion.