[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJrKpLbvpByciJ_FFT9vKACZX2XE3w=nHGpfgUX03KivSVfSyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:54:24 -0500
From: Manish Kurup <kurup.manish@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren
<pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Aring <aring@...atatu.com>,
Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>,
Manish Kurup <manish.kurup@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 0/3] nfp act_vlan: Rewrite of the TC vlan
action to use the RCU, and incorporated review comments
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 8:39 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Manish Kurup <kurup.manish@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:30:09 -0500
>
>> The last version I sent out (with changes for comments), was v10, But
>> I noticed that you applied v7 (without the reverse xmas tree patch on
>> patch #3).
>
> Check my tree, I actually applied a later version than v7.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
Yes, you're right. I did a 'git pull' this morning, and saw the log
with my patches in there, but the changes didnt include the reverse
xmas tree patches that I'd made after comments by Pieter, Alexander,
Jamal and you,my latest review version mail - v10. What I see after
the git pull, in the repo (net-next): v9.
I guess you dropped my reverse xmas tree changes (v10). Sorry for the confusion.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists